This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] document ISL requirement for GCC installation
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> On 08/13/2011 06:02 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:32, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> I advise either removing the option for CLooG to use bundled ISL, or
>>> making the bundled version the recommended version for GCC. ?Having too
>>> many ways to configure things is bad.
>>
>> I would prefer using the ISL bundled with CLooG and not have
>> to provide a way to configure GCC with ISL.
>
> which would be exactly the way no distribution would use it. So please just
> don't bundle ISL with CLoog.
Well, I would simply have linked the bundled ISL statically into libcloog.
Richard.