This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
- From: "Terry Guo" <terry dot guo at arm dot com>
- To: "'Gerald Pfeifer'" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Richard Earnshaw" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, "Matthew Gretton-Dann" <Matthew dot Gretton-Dann at arm dot com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:27:25 +0800
- Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
- References: <000001cc558a$169d09e0$43d71da0$@guo@arm.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1108081140250.2882@gerinyyl.fvgr>
Ping.
BR,
Terry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry.guo@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:13 PM
> To: 'Gerald Pfeifer'
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann
> Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
>
> Hi Gerald,
>
> Thanks for your review. Here I attached the updated one. Is it ok to
> commit?
>
> BR,
> Terry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:gerald@pfeifer.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:43 PM
> > To: Terry Guo
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw; Matthew Gretton-Dann
> > Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Announce new ARM/embedded-4_6-branch branch
> >
> > Hi Terry,
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Terry Guo wrote:
> > > This new branch intends to provide fixes and enhancements for GCC
> 4.6
> > > when used with ARM embedded cores.
> > >
> > > The attached patch adds documentation for this branch.
> >
> > thanks for thinking to document this! This looks good modulo two
> > notes.
> >
> > + <dd>This branch provides bug-fixes, minor enhancements and
> stability
> > + fixes for GCC-4.6 when used with ARM's embedded cores, such as the
> > + Cortex-R and Cortex-M processors. Most patches will be back-ports
> > + of changes already made on trunk. Patches should be marked with
> the
> > + tag <code>[arm-embedded]</code> in the subject line. The branch
> is
> > + maintained by ARM.</dd>
> >
> > Would you mind making ths GCC 4.6 (without the dash), and perhaps
> > noting which version of GCC 4.6 this is based on (or whether it
> > tracks the general GCC 4.6 branch)?
> >
> > As for maintainership, we usually have individuals, not companies
> > there. Could you name one or two (or three)? You can always adjust
> > the list an any time later on, without any form of approval.
> >
> > Gerald
> >