This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Cleanup DW_CFA_GNU_args_size handling


2011/8/1 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>:
> On 08/01/2011 11:42 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>> Is there a specific reason not to define
>> ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS on AVR?

I havn't define ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS because AVR have a very small
displacement for memory addressing (63 bytes) and I think that better
to have a minimal possible frame size (because of difficult addressing
of a local variables outside of fp+63 boundary).

Generally, ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS enlarge the frame size.

Denis.

PS: I didn't try ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS for AVR. May be results will
be better than I think.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]