This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, testsuite] Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-70.c (was Re: vect-70.c fails on spu-elf)

From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
To: Ira Rosen <IRAR at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, Dorit Nuzman <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hubicka at ucw dot cz
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:39:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-70.c (was Re: vect-70.c fails on spu-elf)
References: <OFB42E8F48.B7807DC7-ONC22578D7.0045D091-C22578D7.00472286@il.ibm.com> from "Ira Rosen" at Jul 24, 2011 03:56:58 PM <201107250919.p6P9Jsra002959@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <OF4C1FD1A6.93B35DED-ONC22578D8.003C32E6-C22578D8.00403C1A@il.ibm.com>

On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Ira Rosen wrote:
> OK, so I am choosing the second patch.
> Tested by Ulrich on spu-elf, and on x86_64-suse-linux.
> 
> OK for mainline? And 4.6?

Ok.  Maintainers in particular areas should feel free to review/approve testsuite patches in their areas.  Since you're a vector maintainer, and this is a vector testcase, I think you're the natural person to approve it here.

> testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/vect/vect-70.c: Reduce the data size to fit
> 	SPU local store.

References:
- Re: vect-70.c fails on spu-elf
  - From: Ira Rosen
- Re: vect-70.c fails on spu-elf
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- [patch, testsuite] Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-70.c (was Re: vect-70.c fails on spu-elf)
  - From: Ira Rosen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]