This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH [5/n] X32: Supprot 32bit address
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:47 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, this is an example from PR I am referring to. Did you try to
>>> define LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS? It is supposed to fix this.
>>>
>>
>> They make things even more complex. ix86_simplify_base_index_disp
>> is called after reload is done since we can do this translation safely
>> only on hard registers, not on pseudo registers.
>>
>
> Hi Uros,
>
> The current implementation ?has been tested extensively. I'd like to keep
> it ASIS so that we can have a working x32 support. ?We will revisit it later:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49765
>
> after we have a working x32 GCC.
This can not be only my decision, I have CCd other x86 maintainers and
RMs for their opinion on this question.
Uros.