This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: "Fang, Changpeng" <Changpeng dot Fang at amd dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:44:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
References: <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D005980DC6E8@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> <BANLkTikG5Eb7r0uUt0sDFdaE6vzToGwVCg@mail.gmail.com> <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D005980DC6EC@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> <BANLkTi=jywmPF9+Qyn8r6s5r51L1D-=csA@mail.gmail.com> <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D005980DC6F8@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> <BANLkTin7cnq+SNAA37mSx91soQ2jMLn_EA@mail.gmail.com> <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D005980DC6F9@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> <BANLkTi=2j_AUN3wu_8w9ywNfPGHsGH5eyQ@mail.gmail.com> <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D005980DC6FA@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Fang, Changpeng <Changpeng.Fang@amd.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ?I added AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_STORE to ix86_tune_indices
> and put m_COREI7, m_BDVER1 and m_GENERIC as the targets that
> enable it.
>
> Is this OK?

Can you do something similar to how MASK_ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
is handled?

Thanks.

H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng

References:
- [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng
- Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Richard Guenther
- RE: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng
- Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng
- Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng
- Re: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [PATCH, PR 49089] Don't split AVX256 unaligned loads by default on bdver1 and generic
  - From: Fang, Changpeng

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]