This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [vta, graphite?] propagate degenerate phi nodes into debug stmts
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 07:38:26 -0300
- Subject: Re: [vta, graphite?] propagate degenerate phi nodes into debug stmts
- References: <orfx8ph31l.fsf@livre.localdomain> <84fc9c000911080156iff6d687o26db10af3e9fba5d@mail.gmail.com> <ortywuw6bb.fsf@livre.localdomain> <84fc9c000911170739v76a2e911vc6794e597c8d134e@mail.gmail.com> <orhbsrgqnz.fsf@livre.localdomain> <84fc9c000911190253v19390bd2le683c769bf0ab4d@mail.gmail.com> <ory61jkmr0.fsf@livre.localdomain> <BANLkTin0TpcbugNaZwEi-X3jnY6UiwpMJA@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 6, 2011, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You meant 4.6 stage1, but I missed it. ÂHow's it for 4.7 stage1?
>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu.
> Isn't exactly ICEing for num_ssa_operands/delink_stmt_imm_use.
Uhh. Looks like I didn't update the patch per your comments before
putting it aside for stage1, after all. Sorry.
> So, the op_iter_init change is ok, the other two not - they should
> either ICE or work for PHIs (by using FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE
> in them).
The latter is legitimately called for GIMPLE_PHI, so I changed it to use
FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE. The former was never called for GIMPLE_PHIs,
so I put in an assert there.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu. Ok?
for gcc/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* tree-flow-inline.h (op_iter_init): Reject GIMPLE_PHI stmts.
(num_ssa_operands): Likewise.
(op_iter_init_phiuse): Forward-declare.
(delink_stmt_imm_use): Iterate with FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE.
Index: gcc/tree-flow-inline.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-flow-inline.h.orig 2011-06-03 11:56:24.619482744 -0300
+++ gcc/tree-flow-inline.h 2011-06-07 04:15:18.344729725 -0300
@@ -737,9 +737,11 @@ clear_and_done_ssa_iter (ssa_op_iter *pt
static inline void
op_iter_init (ssa_op_iter *ptr, gimple stmt, int flags)
{
- /* We do not support iterating over virtual defs or uses without
+ /* PHI nodes require a different iterator initialization path. We
+ do not support iterating over virtual defs or uses without
iterating over defs or uses at the same time. */
- gcc_checking_assert ((!(flags & SSA_OP_VDEF) || (flags & SSA_OP_DEF))
+ gcc_checking_assert (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI
+ && (!(flags & SSA_OP_VDEF) || (flags & SSA_OP_DEF))
&& (!(flags & SSA_OP_VUSE) || (flags & SSA_OP_USE)));
ptr->defs = (flags & (SSA_OP_DEF|SSA_OP_VDEF)) ? gimple_def_ops (stmt) : NULL;
if (!(flags & SSA_OP_VDEF)
@@ -868,11 +870,14 @@ num_ssa_operands (gimple stmt, int flags
tree t;
int num = 0;
+ gcc_checking_assert (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI);
FOR_EACH_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (t, stmt, iter, flags)
num++;
return num;
}
+static inline use_operand_p
+op_iter_init_phiuse (ssa_op_iter *ptr, gimple phi, int flags);
/* Delink all immediate_use information for STMT. */
static inline void
@@ -882,7 +887,7 @@ delink_stmt_imm_use (gimple stmt)
use_operand_p use_p;
if (ssa_operands_active ())
- FOR_EACH_SSA_USE_OPERAND (use_p, stmt, iter, SSA_OP_ALL_USES)
+ FOR_EACH_PHI_OR_STMT_USE (use_p, stmt, iter, SSA_OP_ALL_USES)
delink_imm_use (use_p);
}
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer