This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [pph] Clean up PPH tests (issue4572042)
On 6/6/11, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> So, I'm getting this:
>
> Running /home/dnovillo/pph/svn/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/pph.exp ...
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/c120060625-1.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/c1eabi1.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1autometh.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1functions.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1functions.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1special.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1special.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for bogus
> messages, line )
> FAIL: g++.dg/pph/x1special.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for excess
> errors)
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1template.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1template.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for
> bogus messages, line )
> FAIL: g++.dg/pph/x1template.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for excess
> errors)
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1tmplclass.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1tmplfunc.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1tmplfunc.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for
> bogus messages, line )
> FAIL: g++.dg/pph/x1tmplfunc.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for excess
> errors)
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1typerefs.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc -I. (test for bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for
> bogus messages, line )
> XPASS: g++.dg/pph/x1variables.cc -fpph-map=pph.map -I. (test for
> bogus messages, line )
>
> === g++ Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 176
> # of unexpected failures 3
> # of unexpected successes 17
> # of expected failures 45
>
> The three FAILs are expected then? Those are the ones you mentioned
> can't be easily XFAIL'd?
These are probably changes in the line number of the ICE,
and so the dg-bogus needs updating.
--
Lawrence Crowl