This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 06/06/11 14:26, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:This condition is not covered by const_ok_for_op, because "outer" can be equal to other rtx codes, which are not covered in const_ok_for_op like IF_THEN_ELSE or MULT (I have several ICEs with these codes). I don't know how to fix this correctly - should I add all codes to const_ok_for_op or maybe just replace default alternative from gcc_unreachable() to "return 0;" ?if (const_ok_for_arm (INTVAL (x)) - || const_ok_for_arm (~INTVAL (x))) + || const_ok_for_arm (~INTVAL (x)) + || (TARGET_THUMB2&& outer == PLUS + && (const_ok_for_op (INTVAL (x), outer))))
Sorry, I should have noticed before ...
This whole condition should be covered by a single call to const_ok_for_op. It already calls const_ok_for_arm internally.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |