This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [build] Move MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT to toplevel libgcc
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, Douglas Rupp <rupp at gnat dot com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, John David Anglin <dave dot anglin at nrc-cnrc dot gc dot ca>, Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, Kai Tietz <ktietz at redhat dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:40:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: [build] Move MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT to toplevel libgcc
- References: <yddr57gry79.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <43A4E364-0CF4-445E-9AFD-19E52361FCFD@comcast.net> <yddd3ixczhj.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <E82BF0E5-A8A6-4F30-8326-BE4E8623E6C1@comcast.net> <yddipspzbgm.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On Jun 1, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> I can certainly do it this way for now, but if we could do away with the
>>> tests completely, that would be cleaner.
>>
>> Agreed, though, I don't believe the test is superfluous.
>
> You still haven't answered my question wrt. Darwin 8 vs. 64-bit on
> PowerPC. Perhaps we can do away with DARWIN_LIBSYSTEM_HAS_UNWIND
> completely?
To quote my previous email:
>> I don't believe the test is superfluous.
This means that I can't say for sure that is is unneeded. There was 64-bit support on darwin 8 as I recall.