This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Christopher Jefferson <chris at bubblescope dot net>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:09:25 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
References: <4DD69790.8070101@redhat.com> <20110520193035.GA30195@synopsys.com> <52A1AA49-7247-4560-976B-45F06F5E2497@bubblescope.net>

On 05/20/2011 03:45 PM, Christopher Jefferson wrote:

I could see the temptation to introduce this as a mandatory warning for a while, and only add it under -pedantic. However, it might be easier to just force people to fix their code.

With the patch I just checked in it's an error by default or a warning with -fpermissive (or silent with -fpermissive -w), so people can delay fixing their code if they want to.

Jason

References:
- RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: RFA (libstdc++): C++/v3 PATCH for c++/24163 (lookup in dependent bases) and c++/29131
  - From: Christopher Jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]