This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] C++0x, teach the parser to parse virt-specifier-seq for member functions
On 25 April 2011 20:06, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> could we use enums instead?
>> No reason not to, except that we don't for the cp_cv_quals above. :) I
>> followed
>> the same approach.
> Sure, let's use enums for the named values. ?But I think we still want to
> use the int typedef for variables and parameters.
Would you like me to convert the cp_cv_quals values to enums in the same go?
Where should I put the flags for semantic analysis? DECL_LANG_FLAG?
Or TREE_LANG_FLAG?