This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inliner heuristics facelift

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
Cc: hubicka at ucw dot cz, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:29:10 +0200
Subject: Re: Inliner heuristics facelift
References: <20110417105416.A26E33BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20110417123842.GE5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20110417142511.CF3D53BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>

> > For me, I get everything inlined except for:
> 
> Oops! looking at my mail, I realized that I did not timed fatigue, but ac.
> With the patch the only difference for fatigue is that the threshold for
> full inlining decreased from 125 to 113.

See, we make progress. 10 more patches like this and you can set threshold to 0 ;)

This is expected behaviour - the patch changes interpretation of inline bounds
from limits on function sizes on limits of estimated function sizes after
inlining. Those 12 instructions are accounting function call overhead.

Honza
> 
> Sorry for the noise.
> 
> Dominique

References:
- Re: Inliner heuristics facelift
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres
- Re: Inliner heuristics facelift
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Inliner heuristics facelift
  - From: Dominique Dhumieres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]