This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR47592 - Multiple function invocation with ALLOCATE (SOURCE=REPEAT('x',bar()))

From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:24:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR47592 - Multiple function invocation with ALLOCATE (SOURCE=REPEAT('x',bar()))
References: <AANLkTimq9af+mnhnX2Ois+_sC+ZL=WiUn=6rGAQwv+hB@mail.gmail.com> <4D4E8169.3060808@net-b.de> <AANLkTi=u=7-heT4GgiY8NKds6UbOo5uPaBEfNxAQMaj+@mail.gmail.com>

Dear All,

Sending        gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
Sending        gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
Sending        gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Adding         gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_with_source_1.f90
Transmitting file data ....
Committed revision 169862.

>> That's mostly unchanged from previous version, but couldn't one replace it
>> by a simple "if (gfc_expr_attr (expr).allocatable)"? I think gfc_expr_attr
>> does not always do the right thing (regarding when to ignore and not ignore
>> array/substring refs), but I think here it does.
>

With this suggestion - thanks.

Cheers

Paul

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR47592 - Multiple function invocation with ALLOCATE (SOURCE=REPEAT('x',bar()))
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR47592 - Multiple function invocation with ALLOCATE (SOURCE=REPEAT('x',bar()))
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]