This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] Nits in gcc-4.6/changes.html
- From: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
- To: "Nicola Pero" <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>
- Cc: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "Rainer Orth" <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>, "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "Hariharan Sandanagobalane" <hariharans at picochip dot com>, "Andreas Krebbel" <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:26:29 +0000
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Nits in gcc-4.6/changes.html
- References: <ydd8vy06ha9.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102022313530.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr> <1296764419.800320155@192.168.4.58>
On 3 Feb 2011, at 20:20, Nicola Pero wrote:
* Objective-C and Objective-C++:
Most features are available in both languages. Rather than stating
this over and over again, which makes the text repetetive and
boring,
state it once up-front and only point out exceptions?
Nicola, what do you think?
Sure, sounds great.
for the last two entries one could use "Objective-C family" or
Objective-C* (if the latter is allowable in GCC docs.)
comments?
Iain