This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] Nits in gcc-4.6/changes.html
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Nicola Pero <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>, Hariharan Sandanagobalane <hariharans at picochip dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 23:19:45 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Nits in gcc-4.6/changes.html
- References: <ydd8vy06ha9.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I've read all of the GCC 4.6 changes.html over the weekend and found a
> couple of issues (mostly nits). The ones I consider obvious are
> included in the patch below (though I'm not a native speeker and may
> simply be mistaken), but there are a couple of others:
>
> * Fortran, Fortran 2008 support has been extended:, Minor changes:
>
> Perhaps use <ul></ul>?
I'm not sure what you have in mind here? Looking at the document
there already is an <ul>, perhaps you can suggest a patch?
> * Go:
>
> List supported targets. GNU/Linux, Solaris is in the works (mostly
> done), *BSD?
I believe that sounds useful. Ian, what do you think?
> * Objective-C and Objective-C++:
>
> Most features are available in both languages. Rather than stating
> this over and over again, which makes the text repetetive and boring,
> state it once up-front and only point out exceptions?
Nicola, what do you think?
> * picochip:
>
> Remove, or will this be filled?
Remove if it remains empty, though let's ping Hariharan -- any changes
you're planning to document?
> * S/390, ...:
>
> ... make use of the following instruction facilities:
>
> Too many hyphens in the following list?
Andreas? This looks a bit strange, but I know that s390 terminology
always tends to be a bit different. :-)
Gerald