This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression

From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:35:56 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression
References: <20101217172046.GK25059@nightcrawler> <4D24C90E.30601@redhat.com> <20110121140729.GS6247@codesourcery.com> <4D39B26F.9000406@redhat.com> <20110124174940.GJ6247@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:49:41AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:21:03AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Yes, that's what I had in mind.  Let's have a predicate that does the  
> > test we want with a name that accurately describes it.
> 
> OK, how about this patch?  It includes Jakub's proposed testcase from
> the PR.  Tested bootstrap, g++ and libstdc++.

Ping.  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01667.html

-Nathan

References:
- Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression
  - From: Nathan Froyd
- Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [PATCH,c++] fix PR 46890, parsing regression
  - From: Nathan Froyd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]