This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at frontier dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:36:06 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
References: <4D43495C.5060207@frontier.com> <4D443499.20507@net-b.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101301807350.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr>

On 01/30/2011 09:08 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tobias Burnus wrote:

But you additionally need to apply the attached patch.
I am not sure who can/needs to review the patch for
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp


Practically I'd suggest to handle this like a "simple" Fortran
patch, that is, have it reviewed/approved by one of the other
Fortran maintainers.

OK, well Tobias, if you review and approve, I will commit. Looks pretty safe to me.

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR47434 Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]