This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.

From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-graphite at googlegroups dot com
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:39:51 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
References: <1295377990-18603-1-git-send-email-sebpop@gmail.com> <201101250858.15402.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <AANLkTimvxkYsxnw0qLh_sqOKE-HKxoXC4cORzH=yHrBp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikvkdA_DRYayn32eeXm-Q8NKeDC5gQ-Xre2rbST@mail.gmail.com> <20110125131411.GY2724@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <AANLkTik+VCELTcOh1n0p3rbbsNrZ3B7=tG5+YiA0o+3Z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=1apfQQxe5SutCFWWRLgK-h4MJ7UgvUgpxnqK4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikk6sFXJce1rS98NsMTaUZ=5DA_Hai0GG6NRjHH@mail.gmail.com> <20110125152653.GZ2724@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:26, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:42:33AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> That said, I'm quite unhappy about the new PPL version requirement, was it
>> >>> really necessary at this point in 4.6 development (also the cloog-ppl
>> >>> requirement)? ?It will cause quite a lot of hassles to many of the
>> >>> distributions.
>>
>> With PPL 0.10 most of the interchange testcases will fail to be interchanged.
>
> Fail as in are miscompiled or just aren't interchanged?

Some of the interchange patterns would fail, but there should be no miscompiles.

Sebastian

References:
- [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: [PATCH] Fail when PPL 0.11 is not present and CLooG has been requested.
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]