This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Robert Millan <rmh at gnu dot org>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:44:59 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split
References: <AANLkTimkJ2UukvEJG7rUSQLiSmz3YZN8nYbNE=HoJMUy@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1101182022540.29750@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AANLkTikiuPmw4uZi2GqzDmy-frcNFpPanLsaB8-kGWK4@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Robert Millan wrote:

> 2011/1/18 Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>:
> > The key principle of this patch is that *targets use gnu-user.h if and
> > only if they use linux.h*.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion, I was under the assumption that after your
> patch linux.h was only used by Linux-based targets.  Is this meant
> for a newer patch?

Yes.  Such a patch will also define TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS and 
TARGET_HAS_SINCOS to 1 in headers such as gnu.h and remove some 
definitions in config.gcc that are no longer needed after that change.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split
  - From: Robert Millan

References:
- [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split
  - From: Robert Millan
- Re: [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] fix regression after linux.h / gnu-user.h split
  - From: Robert Millan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]