This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH for c++/37729 (variadic templates + late-specified return types)
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:18:24 -0800
- Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/37729 (variadic templates + late-specified return types)
- References: <49C7F8DF.80400@redhat.com> <AANLkTim_HShPS=x6zLdgWp=jPThTrTM1VfOLPQGmHq6d@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I noticed a while back that pack expansion didn't work in a late-specified
>> return type, but didn't feel like dealing with it. ?After the recent change
>> to the handling of function parms, I expected it to be more tractable, and
>> indeed it was.
>>
>> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk (completing new feature, impact
>> limited to C++0x mode).
>>
>>
>
> This caused ICE in:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
>
It also caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
--
H.J.