This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements

From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:24:39 -0800
Subject: Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
References: <201101061725.p06HPCX21825@lucas.cup.hp.com> <4D260FB1.80800@redhat.com> <1294345320.21802.38.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <4D279B39.2090404@redhat.com> <1294686965.21802.78.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <4D2B6079.5040904@redhat.com>
Reply-to: sje at cup dot hp dot com

> That's exactly the operation we want from vec_interleave_lowv4hi.

Could the change in vec_interleave_lowv4hi be conflicting with the code
in ia64_unpack_assemble (in ia64.c).  Maybe if vec_interleave_lowv4hi
is doing the right thing we don't need the TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN check in
ia64_unpack_assemble.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: [ia64, rfa] vector pattern improvements
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]