This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c on alpha, i386, x86_64 (PR tree-optimization/46021)
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:50:22 +0100
- Subject: Don't XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c on alpha, i386, x86_64 (PR tree-optimization/46021)
Given that this test XPASSes on alpha-dec-osf5.1b, i386-pc-solaris2.*
(both 32 and 64-bit) for a long time and just produces noise, I propose
the following patch to reduce that noise.
On the other hand, given that the xfail { ! <target> } list is growing
ever longer, it may finally be time to invert the xfail and only do it
where necessary.
However, bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11.
Ok for mainline?
Rainer
2011-01-02 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
PR tree-optimization/46021
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on alpha*-*-*,
i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-*.
diff -r 893c657483ed gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c Sat Jan 01 23:58:43 2011 +0100
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c Sun Jan 02 00:04:15 2011 +0100
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@
that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this
by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
as true. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University