This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCHx2,java] Fix java tree checking assert and


On 12/11/2010 12:10 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
>     Hello lists,
> 
> 
>   The attached patches fix a couple of problems(*) exposed by the tree ssa
> loop prefetch pass in recent trunk builds of jc1:
> 
> - loop prefetch generates an invalid gimple call to __builtin_prefetch(),
> because it uses the integer_three_node global tree; because java doesn't take
> advantage of the core build_common_tree_nodes_2() routine but sets up all the
> nodes itself, this was missing any initialisation - integer_three_node is a
> recent addition to the core, and the prefetch pass was adjusted to use it, but
> java was inadvertently omitted.
> 
> - turning on tree dump can cause a crash when it tries to generate a name for
> a nested function, because put_decl_node doesn't understand that the context
> of a function_decl can be another function_decl.
> 
>   The first I fixed by adding the missing initialisation - long-term I guess
> it would be better to see if java couldn't use build_common_tree_nodes_2() in
> some way, but that's not stage3 material.  The second I fixed by making it
> treat the nested function as just another level of scope, adding another
> period-separated segment to the generated name.
> 
> java/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* decl.c (java_init_decl_processing): Initialise integer_three_node.
> 	* lang.c (put_decl_node): Handle nested function decls.
> 
>   I verified that this fixed the failing compile that I had seen in the
> testsuite, now I'm taking the combined patchset for a full bootstrap and test
> cycle on i686-pc-cygwin.  OK if that completes without regressions?

Yes, that looks OK.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]