This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PING^2: resubmitted IRA improvement patches
- From: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Bergner, Peter" <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:10:29 -0500
- Subject: Re: PING^2: resubmitted IRA improvement patches
- References: <4CA4F868.2080009@redhat.com> <4CC1C4A7.7060205@naturalbridge.com> <4CC46430.4080304@redhat.com> <4CFD0B66.2050402@naturalbridge.com> <4D025095.10102@redhat.com>
I think that it should go in. Vlad played by the rules.
kenny
On 12/10/2010 11:08 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/06/10 09:12, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
sorry, for taking so long. i have been temporarily put on another
project.
i applied all of your patches to the trunk, and then reread all of
the ira files looking for parts that i did not understand. many of
them relate to the patches at hand but some are things that should
have been documented in earlier rounds that were just missed. When
these comments are properly addressed, you can check in your patches.
I think in addition to addressing documentation issues you've raised,
we need to decide if we want this patch in GCC 4.6 or if it should be
postponed until GCC 4.7.
The patch was clearly submitted early enough, but we're also further
out of stage1 than I'm comfortable just saying "go ahead and
install". My temptation is still to get the patch in given its
clear benefits, but I want others to have a chance to chime in.
Thanks,
Jeff