This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: "Fang, Changpeng" <Changpeng dot Fang at amd dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "sebpop at gmail dot com" <sebpop at gmail dot com>, "Yazdani, Reza" <Reza dot Yazdani at amd dot com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:54:23 -0800
Subject: Re: [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64
References: <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D004C17683E8@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com> <AANLkTimvSuUwdS5KYm41mWVFhq-R71KvXkiywUeHFk_Z@mail.gmail.com> <D4C76825A6780047854A11E93CDE84D004C17683E9@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Fang, Changpeng <Changpeng.Fang@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> "-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure" isn't well tested:
> We have tested the gcc testsuite and SPEC cpu benchmarks.
>
>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
> Bug 46829 does not appear in 4.6 trunk, and the patched compiler does not
> not has this bug either.

Which revision are are you using? I verified it with trunk revision 167517.


-- 
H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64
  - From: Fang, Changpeng

References:
- [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64
  - From: Fang, Changpeng
- Re: [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [Patch, i386] Turn on -fschedule-insns and -fsched-pressure by default for x86-64
  - From: Fang, Changpeng

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]