This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC,c++] fix PR 45329, provide information on overload resolution

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:59:37 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC,c++] fix PR 45329, provide information on overload resolution
References: <20101117204631.GE24469@nightcrawler> <4CE6FD56.1080800@redhat.com> <20101202220946.GH18963@nightcrawler>

On 12/02/2010 05:09 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:

When you say "indented", do you mean like this:

pr45329.C: In function 'int foo2(int)':
pr45329.C:26:7: error: no matching function for call to 'foo(int&)'
pr45329.C:26:7: note: candidates are:
pr45329.C:7:5: note: int foo(int, int)
pr45329.C:7:5: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
pr45329.C:19:5: note: int foo(const S&)
pr45329.C:19:5: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'int' to 'const S&'

Yep.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC,c++] fix PR 45329, provide information on overload resolution
  - From: Nathan Froyd

References:
- Re: [RFC,c++] fix PR 45329, provide information on overload resolution
  - From: Nathan Froyd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]