This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,lto] Fix PR42690 and related LTO-vs-static-linking issues.
On 18/11/2010 11:54, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 17/11/2010 10:36, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 16/11/2010 16:33, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are we sure that all -l options are joined ones? The driver
>>>>>> accepts -l m just fine.
>>>>> The driver converts -l options to joined form when passing them to
>>>>> add_infile. I don't know about the -l options contained directly
>>>>> in specs; that's what would need checking. (Specs other than those
>>>>> in driver_self_specs do not go through the option processing
>>>>> machinery; they are generating command lines for programs other
>>>>> than the driver.)
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm ok with the patch if Joseph thinks it is ok.
>>>>> I have no comments on this patch.
>>>> Right you are. I'll test the patch with separated -l options and see
>>>> if it works; if not, I'll submit a respin,
>> Herewith the respin. Same ChangeLog as before; only differences from
>> previous version are contained to pass_through_libs_spec_func().
>>
>> LTO-bootstrap and test cycle in progress on i686-pc-cygwin. OK once that
>> completes successfully?
>
> Ok.
>
Committed revision 167091.
cheers,
DaveK