This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Pass locations through option handling functions

From: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:21:35 +0100
Subject: Re: Pass locations through option handling functions
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011121743490.22091@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20101116.080039.122791939.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>

> sh.c:sh_option_optimization_table has entries for -m options
> and it looks that they trigger the above error.  A quick grep
> shows mcore, s390, sh, v850 and perhaps i386-*-solaris2.1x
> have such entries in their option_optimization_tables.  I've
> confirmed that s390-unknown-linux-gnu cc1 ICEs with a similar
> way for gcc.dg/pr37106-1.c.

Confirmed. gcc.dg/O16384.c seems to be same failure.

-Andreas-

References:
- Pass locations through option handling functions
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Pass locations through option handling functions
  - From: Kaz Kojima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]