This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/45722

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:19:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/45722
References: <201011140017.47860.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <AANLkTi=RBvwCLz4AA=AeHjxru_1xz9jHL4=DdoEsTcFY@mail.gmail.com>

> What kind of artificial addressability issues?  Note that the base operand
> of a MEM_REF does not have to be addressable.

So the & in the first operand of the MEM_REF is purely formal?

> Ok.

Thanks.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/45722
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/45722
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch] Fix PR tree-optimization/45722
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]