This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rguenther at suse dot de
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:40:54 +0100
Subject: Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
References: <20101111180115.GE2722@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4CDC33CC.9080406@google.com> <20101111195757.GE29748@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20101111210801.GB26485@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4CDC6065.9060208@google.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:30:13PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 10-11-11 16:08 , Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >Hi,
> >here is updated patch.  Removing flag_whopr is probably easier than keeping in around
> >given that it is usually used in conjunction with flag_lto.
> 
> Great!  Thanks.

Previously we were running most of the testsuites iterating over flags
with -flto and -fwhopr.  Is that going to change to just -flto now (i.e.
fewer tests)?  That would be very much appreciated...

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: -fwhopr and -flto options reorg
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]