This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:17:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: Discussion about merging Go frontend
- References: <mcr7hh8qhb5.fsf@google.com> <4CC45302.9000702@gmail.com> <mcrhbgbyoef.fsf@google.com> <4CC59F1E.7040505@codesourcery.com> <mcrbp6ixhny.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTikEy7ER+CkQdWo0XHPoBORvbp8JZ226QFM68PZv@mail.gmail.com> <87pquy3yh5.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4CC60C5E.6050605@gmail.com> <mcr1v79bx8q.fsf@google.com> <m362what81.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> writes:
>
> Ian> This patch puts the code in libiberty, but it could equally well go in
> Ian> gcc. Anybody want to make an argument one way or another?
>
> Ian> +extern const char *
> Ian> +objfile_attributes_compare (objfile_attributes *attrs1,
>
> GDB already uses the name "objfile" for one of its modules.
> I don't think we have any name clashes with this patch right now, but I
> would prefer to avoid the eventual confusion.
> So, if this is in libiberty, could it please have a different name?
Sure.
Any suggestions?
Ian