This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:59:52 +0200
Subject: Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
References: <4C27E695.9070802@codesourcery.com> <4C286200.30402@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006281009290.17565@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4C2886C7.4040408@gnu.org> <4C28CA2A.7060703@codesourcery.com> <4C28CE9C.9030809@gnu.org> <4C28D9F1.6030309@codesourcery.com> <4CC83135.4080603@ubuntu.com> <4CCA91ED.7010909@redhat.com> <4CCAE033.3010009@ubuntu.com>

On 10/29/2010 04:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:

to summarize:

- in binutils, --with-default-linker= should trigger which linker is
   built, and should determine which linker the ld symlink points to.

- if both linkers are built, the non-default linker build has to be
   enabled with either --enable-ld or --enable-gold.

- values (other than yes or no) passed to --enable-ld and --enable-gold
   are ignored.

Is this the consensus?

Looks good, except that I'd use --enable-default-linker (it's an optional "feature", not an optional "package").

Paolo

References:
- Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
  - From: Matthias Klose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]