This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ping: [PATCH] Support official CLooG.org versions.


Hi,

thanks for the review.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 15:35, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> (now in CC) review this patch?
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00673.html
>
> Aside from Ralf's concerns, I add...
>
> The GPL notice requires a version number, and preferably the "or any
> later version" variant.

Andreas, could you please update the text at the beginning of cloog.m4
with the following notice:

#This file is part of GCC.

#GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
#the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
#Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later
#version.

#GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
#ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
#FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
#for more details.

#You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
#along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
#<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.


>
> "Runtime" checks should be avoided as they won't work when you're
> cross-compiling. ?Did you test a canadian cross?
>

Andreas, I think we could remove all the runtime checks and only rely
on the compile time checks of the CLooG version.  What do you think?

Thanks,
Sebastian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]