This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa

From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:49:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa
References: <AANLkTikW8W=RjoNAQigGgtJKB-_2sp5zaZtjcAMZjBUC@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimtKdit4puXPU6zh5Nx=rhwqL+hBwed_c7DiYZA@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=kn8F3PH51ffLVEdyOjUBQfQct8TQwuhmy1N4_@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:44, Richard Guenther
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the motivation for adding a 2nd unconditional if-conversion pass?

I guess we could make the second if-conversion a sub-pass of
loop-flat, such that it applies only if we flattened some loop.

Sebastian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: [patch] New loop flattening pass on tree-ssa
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]