This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Jie Zhang <jie at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:40:10 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile
References: <4CB866EA.3000709@codesourcery.com> <201010201935.36445.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4CBF9E5A.1040706@codesourcery.com>

> No problem. I can try someone else. The patch changes code in tree ->
> RTL. You are listed as the maintainer for RTL optimizers.

Old debate. :-)  See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-08/msg00106.html

> I know it's not perfectly match but you and Richard Henderson are
> recommended for reviewing my patch on IRC.

That Richard, or one of the others (Richard G.), can indeed do the review.

> Maybe we should have a maintainer for expand pass?

This historically has been subsumed into the middle-end maintainership.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile
  - From: Jie Zhang

References:
- [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile
  - From: Jie Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Prefer packed attribute when conflicts with volatile
  - From: Jie Zhang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]