This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch testsuite]: Set bessel_7.f90 for mingw targets to xfail

From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:41:01 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch testsuite]: Set bessel_7.f90 for mingw targets to xfail
References: <AANLkTimQXgVE+yoBEpmUvn3gOP0eq4ge7YtKEYj5piO3@mail.gmail.com> <4CBC3D8F.6090400@net-b.de>

2010/10/18 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>:
> ?On 10/18/2010 02:19 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>
>> As msvcrt's implementation of bessel-functions have a different
>> behavior in corner-cases then glibc's implementation, the test is for
>> now better to set to xfail.
>>
>> 2010-10-18 ?Kai Tietz
>> ? ? ? ? ? * gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90: Set xfail for mingw targets.
>
> OK.
>
> (If I recall correctly, with MS's BESSEL_YN(n, 0.0) gives NAN rather than
> -INF for x=0.0 and all "n".)

Right.

Applied at revision 165633.

Cheers,
Kai


-- 
|? (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination

References:
- [patch testsuite]: Set bessel_7.f90 for mingw targets to xfail
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch testsuite]: Set bessel_7.f90 for mingw targets to xfail
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]