This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Reorganizing -flto and -fwhopr command line options (Was Re: WHOPR partitioning, take 2)
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 17/10/2010 17:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> I'm really undecided on whether and what to do now to all the option
> >> mess (given it's pre-existent in GCC 4.5).
> >
> > Given the state (and presumably not so widespread use) of LTO with
> > GCC 4.5 I would not worry about compatibility from 4.5 to 4.6 a lot.
> >
> > Gerald
>
> Does that go for the LTO IR format too? Could we change struct lto_header
> to include a compressed_size member, so that LTO sections don't have to be
> single-byte aligned any more and we still know exactly how much zlib data to
> decompress?
Sure, patches for that are welcome.
Richard.