This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators

From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at frontier dot com>
Cc: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:46:51 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
References: <4CBA9AD7.7000505@frontier.com> <1287313367.4555.37.camel@linux-fd1f.site> <4CBB0222.1030907@frontier.com> <201010171611.51602.franke.daniel@gmail.com> <4CBB0AAA.2020507@frontier.com> <4CBBD1B4.6010807@frontier.com>

Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 21:48 -0700 schrieb Jerry DeLisle:

> Daniel's suggestion appears to work.  After some testing I idetified a minor 
> unrelated issue with backward compatibility of an empty STOP statement.  It is 
> unrelated to the BT enumerator consolidation patch. (I will submit a patch for 
> the STOP issue separately)
> 
> With Daniel's change above, OK for trunk?

OK.  (I also looked at this, and found no problems).

Thanks for working on this!

	Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

References:
- [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Daniel Franke
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch,fortran] Revamp type enumerators
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]