This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] replace LIBGCC2_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN with __BYTE_ORDER__
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: Nathan Froyd <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, sje at cup dot hp dot com, dje dot gcc at gmail dot com
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:28:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace LIBGCC2_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN with __BYTE_ORDER__
- References: <20101014015219.GV24720@nightcrawler> <ydd1v7tdnn1.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I don't know about HP-UX, IRIX, OSF/1, or AIX. Steve, Rainer and David,
>> could you please confirm that GCC defining __BYTE_ORDER__ et al will not
>> interfere with system headers on those targets with which you are
>> familiar?
>
> At least on IRIX 6.5 and Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, there's no instance of
> __BYTE_ORDER__ in the system headers.
I was worried about darwin, I checked... No instance there there...