This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] replace LIBGCC2_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN with __BYTE_ORDER__


On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
>> I don't know about HP-UX, IRIX, OSF/1, or AIX.  Steve, Rainer and David,
>> could you please confirm that GCC defining __BYTE_ORDER__ et al will not
>> interfere with system headers on those targets with which you are
>> familiar?
> 
> At least on IRIX 6.5 and Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, there's no instance of
> __BYTE_ORDER__ in the system headers.

I was worried about darwin, I checked...  No instance there there...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]