This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] replace LIBGCC2_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN with __BYTE_ORDER__


Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> writes:

> I don't know about HP-UX, IRIX, OSF/1, or AIX.  Steve, Rainer and David,
> could you please confirm that GCC defining __BYTE_ORDER__ et al will not
> interfere with system headers on those targets with which you are
> familiar?

At least on IRIX 6.5 and Tru64 UNIX V5.1B, there's no instance of
__BYTE_ORDER__ in the system headers.  I'll fire off a bootstrap on both
targets with your patch to check if there's nothing amiss, though this
will take about two days.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]