This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Require canonical type comparison for typedefs again.
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:39:37 -0700
- Subject: Re: Require canonical type comparison for typedefs again.
- References: <m38w4dovkv.fsf@redhat.com> <4C630F87.9060303@redhat.com> <m339ukotsm.fsf@redhat.com> <4C640257.4080804@redhat.com> <m38w2xcwbd.fsf_-_@redhat.com> <4C9673B7.5010505@oracle.com> <m3wrqgaftk.fsf@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com> wrote:
> Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> writes:
>
>> Minor nit...
>
> [...]
>
>> overlong lines?
>
> Oops, correct.
>
> I have addressed that in the patch below and added better comments in
> the offending region. Thanks.
>
> --
> ? ? ? ?Dodji
>
> commit 4e22c88fea32105dbfca1095c457643a1eae56de
> Author: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
> Date: ? Mon Sep 13 12:12:21 2010 +0200
>
> ? ?Restore canonical type comparison for typedefs
>
> ? ?gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> ? ? ? ?* cp-tree.h (TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM_SIBLING_PARMS): Extend this
> ? ? ? ?accessor to make it work on TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARMs too.
Does this patch fix a bug? If yes, please include PR # in ChangeLog entries.
Thanks.
--
H.J.