This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Nathan Sidwell<nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:
Would you like to try this patch? It correctly enables ifunc testing on my i686-pc-linux-gnu glibc 2.11 system
I think this is the wrong approach: if the feature requires linker and/or runtime linker support, the gcc/configure.ac check should check for this and enable or disable it depending on the results. I consider it bad if the compiler accepts the code, only to fall down at link or runtime.
And as I've asked before: what is required to make this work:
* Assembler support for @gnu_indirect_function (already checked in gcc/configure.ac)?
* Linker support? What specifially?
* Runtime linker support? Is this the purpose of your glibc 2.11 check: to test for ld.so.1 support?
nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |