This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Patch, fortran] [2/11] Inline transpose part 1

From: Mikael Morin <mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr>
To: "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:21:06 +0200
Subject: [Patch, fortran] [2/11] Inline transpose part 1
References: <4C8254A0.9020907@sfr.fr>

Obvious and not absolutely necessary: As we are using n to access the loop bounds, let's stop on the loop dimension instead of the array dimension. I've added an assert to check that it is effectively the same. The trans-stmt.c change is there to prevent the assert from triggering. OK for trunk?

Attachment: inline_transpose_1-2.changelog
Description: Text document

Attachment: inline_transpose_1-2.diff
Description: Text document

References:
- [Patch, fortran] [0/11] Inline transpose part 1
  - From: Mikael Morin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]