This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Ping, PATCH] Remove old #if 0-ed code
- From: "Marcin Baczynski" <marbacz at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:00:07 +0200
- Subject: [Ping, PATCH] Remove old #if 0-ed code
- References: <8739u6lwr1.fsf@gmail.com>
Hi,
this patch was not commited nor commented.
Are patches like that unwanted, or is there something "obviously" wrong
with it (I'm new to GCC so I may not see things that are obvious to
others here, though I think it's OK to remove a piece of code which is
unused since last century)?
___
This code was #if 0-ed over 12 years ago.
2010-08-22 Marcin Baczynski <marbacz@gmail.com>
* dwarf2out.c (file scope): Remove garbage.
(gen_subprogram_die): Same.
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c (wersja 163449)
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c (kopia robocza)
@@ -6043,9 +6043,6 @@ static GTY ((param_is (struct vcall_insn
/* Record whether the function being analyzed contains inlined
functions. */
static int current_function_has_inlines;
-#if 0 && defined (MIPS_DEBUGGING_INFO)
-static int comp_unit_has_inlines;
-#endif
/* The last file entry emitted by maybe_emit_file(). */
static GTY(()) struct dwarf_file_data * last_emitted_file;
@@ -18960,18 +18957,6 @@ gen_subprogram_die (tree decl, dw_die_re
current_function_has_inlines = 0;
decls_for_scope (outer_scope, subr_die, 0);
-
-#if 0 && defined (MIPS_DEBUGGING_INFO)
- if (current_function_has_inlines)
- {
- add_AT_flag (subr_die, DW_AT_MIPS_has_inlines, 1);
- if (! comp_unit_has_inlines)
- {
- add_AT_flag (comp_unit_die, DW_AT_MIPS_has_inlines, 1);
- comp_unit_has_inlines = 1;
- }
- }
-#endif
}
/* Add the calling convention attribute if requested. */
add_calling_convention_attribute (subr_die, decl);