This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: sje at cup dot hp dot com
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:42:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c
References: <201009021625.o82GPVc11962@lucas.cup.hp.com> <DA1ADDE5-A5CD-4E4D-893E-A11A96A39F74@gmail.com> <1283445466.14298.46.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com>

On 09/02/2010 09:37 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 09:29 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Shouldn't target stdint_types be true now for all targets? Sinc
> 
> I think stdint.h should exist for all targets now but I am not sure if
> the types like uint32_t will always exist.  The failure I am getting
> is because uint32_t is not defined.
> 
> It looks like (at least on IA64 HP-UX) uint32_t is only defined if I
> specify -std=c99.

The test case would not be hurt by either adding -std=c99 to dg-options,
or switching the types to "unsigned" and "unsigned long long".

I'm fine with either of those changes.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c
  - From: Steve Ellcey

References:
- [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [patch, testsuite, stdint] Patch for gcc.dg/torture/pr44806.c
  - From: Steve Ellcey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]