This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for AMD Dispatch Scheduler
- From: reza yazdani <yazdani_reza at yahoo dot com>
- To: "Vladimir N. Makarov" <vmakarov at redhat dot com>, Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz, ubizjak at gmail dot com
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Patch for AMD Dispatch Scheduler
I thought we did that when we talked to SuSE. In presentation we had at Austin, we specifically asked if this implementation was okay and they said it is okay.
Reza
--- On Fri, 8/20/10, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Patch for AMD Dispatch Scheduler
> To: "Vladimir N. Makarov" <vmakarov@redhat.com>
> Cc: "reza yazdani" <yazdani_reza@yahoo.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jh@suse.cz, ubizjak@gmail.com
> Date: Friday, August 20, 2010, 2:57 PM
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:29,
> Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > I guess you could avoid the current implementation if
> you discussed
> > the approach with the GCC community before starting
> the
> > implementation.
>
> FYI, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-06/msg00402.html
>
> Sebastian
>