This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, _eh, dawin] Allow targets to suppress epilogues in _eh frames.

From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
To: IainS <developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk>
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 06:49:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, _eh, dawin] Allow targets to suppress epilogues in _eh frames.
References: <89584BF2-10CD-45DE-A4A5-4C2EE43396B3@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> <20100814021955.GA3962@bromo.med.uc.edu> <0E98BF0D-9789-4241-BF8B-43DF480839D8@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk>

On Aug 14, 2010, at 6:49 AM, IainS wrote:
> if we say that darwin does not support -fasynchronous-unwind-tables, then we should simply skip this test.

darwin would like it...  I don't know of anyone that is twisting in the wind on it however, so it could be xfailed for now, if one wants a cleaner run.

References:
- [Patch, _eh, dawin] Allow targets to suppress epilogues in _eh frames.
  - From: IainS
- Re: [Patch, _eh, dawin] Allow targets to suppress epilogues in _eh frames.
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [Patch, _eh, dawin] Allow targets to suppress epilogues in _eh frames.
  - From: IainS

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]