This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:36:12PM +0100, IainS wrote:Hi HJ,
On 13 Aug 2010, at 18:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:39 AM, IainS <developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk> wrote:In order to do that it was necessary to get -mtune=core2 to work .. ... this had a couple of residual cases where the use of movq is incompatible with the darwin assembler.
Do you know -mtune=core generates slower code than -mtune=generic?
I have not benchmarked - unfortunately, we volunteers do not have access
to SPEC &c.
I can repeat the benchmarks this weekend but the last time I looked
at the performance of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks on x86_64-apple- darwin10,
I found -mtune=core2 was slower than -mtune=generic.
Do you have any reasonable body of c/c++ benchmarks? I have the Polyhedron fortran ones.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |