This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[testsuite, ARM] Fix gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c for ARM EABI


When testing GCC on a Cortex-M4 board, gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c will hang the testing. That is because we should not use 64 as the size of the stack argument. For ARM EABI, NAME is passed in r0. D is passed in r2 and r3. E, F and G are passed on stack. So the size of the stack argument data is 20. When using 64, the test will try to access too much data on stack. For Cortex-M4 case, it will access invalid memory region, which causes testing hang.


Is it OK? -- Jie Zhang CodeSourcery
	* gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c (STACK_ARGUMENTS_SIZE): Define to
	20 for ARM EABI otherwise 64.
	(bar): Use STACK_ARGUMENTS_SIZE for the third argument
	instead of hard coded 64.

Index: gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c	(revision 163048)
+++ gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c	(working copy)
@@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
 
 #define INTEGER_ARG  5
 
+#ifdef __ARM_EABI__
+/* For ARM EABI, NAME is passed in r0.  D is passed in r2 and r3.
+   E, F and G are passed on stack.  So the size of the stack argument
+   data is 20.  */
+#define STACK_ARGUMENTS_SIZE  20
+#else
+#define STACK_ARGUMENTS_SIZE  64
+#endif
+
 extern void abort(void);
 
 void foo(char *name, double d, double e, double f, int g)
@@ -22,7 +31,7 @@ void foo(char *name, double d, double e,
 
 void bar(char *name, ...)
 {
-  __builtin_apply(foo, __builtin_apply_args(), 64);
+  __builtin_apply(foo, __builtin_apply_args(), STACK_ARGUMENTS_SIZE);
 }
 
 int main(void)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]